
Subscribe & Follow
Jobs
- Content Producer Johannesburg
- Human Resources Intern Cape Town
- Senior Financial Accountant Cape Town
- JobMail Telesales Executive Pretoria
- Telesales Executive Pretoria
- Paid Media Specialist Johannesburg
- Traffic Manager (Junior to Mid) Johannesburg
- Experienced Talent Booker (Agent) Cape Town
- Midweight Copywriter Cape Town
- Music Profiler Durban
Pineapple's ‘caveman’ ad found offensive by advertising board
The ARB found that the ad, which featured wording reminiscent of signs held by street beggars, trivialised poverty and perpetuated harmful stereotypes. As a result, Pineapple Tech has been instructed to withdraw the advertisement in its current form.

The complaint was lodged by a consumer who interpreted the ad as a play on the cardboard signs held by homeless individuals at traffic lights. The complainant argued that the advertisement was insensitive, stating that: ˑThis is not humour. To me, it shows a company out of touch with the lived reality of millions of South Africans. Playing on poverty, desperation and unemployment to sell insurance is highly problematic, to me. It does nothing to foster a culture of humanity and tolerance so desperately needed, not only in South Africa, but in the world right now."
Pineapple Tech defended the ad, claiming that the creative concept was not linked to homelessness or poverty but was instead meant to be a humorous reference to a "caveman" character, illustrating the simplicity of their insurance services. The company denied that the ad was insensitive and argued that the complainant's interpretation was subjective.
However, after reviewing the advertisement under Clause 3.4 (Unacceptable Advertising: Discrimination) and Clause 1.1 (Offensive Advertising) of the Code of Advertising Practice, the ARB found that the ad undermined the intelligence of a marginalised group and perpetuated stereotypes.
The use of the phrase "not a tsotsi" was particularly concerning to the ARB, as it was widely understood to reference street beggars rather than a caveman figure, as the advertiser claimed. The ARB determined that the ad’s wording demeaned and exploited the struggles of homeless individuals, making it both discriminatory and offensive.
In its final ruling, the ARB concluded that the advertisement violated ethical advertising standards and instructed members not to accept the ad in its current form.
Related
Orchard on 25 founder Jay Badza passes away at 38 Karabo Ledwaba 2 days Why Jennifer Hudson's show is a digital marketing sensation Karabo Ledwaba 2 days #InternationalWomensDay2025: Sinmisola Hughes-Obisesan - A visionary driving Africa's creative future Karabo Ledwaba 7 Mar 2025 Complete winners of 97th Oscars, South Africa's The Last Ranger misses out Karabo Ledwaba 3 Mar 2025 Inside Effie’s winning strategies: The hallmarks of an effective campaign Danette Breitenbach 28 Feb 2025 Botswana and De Beers’ marketing push to revive diamond demand Karabo Ledwaba 26 Feb 2025 ARB rules Bellisima mayonnaise packaging mimics Hellmann’s Karabo Ledwaba 24 Feb 2025 What is the Ogilvy Network's secret spice? Karabo Ledwaba 18 Feb 2025

About Karabo Ledwaba
Karabo Ledwaba is a Marketing and Media Editor at Bizcommunity and award-winning journalist. Before joining the publication she worked at Sowetan as a content producer and reporter. She was also responsible for the leadership page at SMag, Sowetan's lifestyle magazine. Contact her at karabo@bizcommunity.com