Slower, lower, weaker... but mining still has its eye on the prize
Changes in the Top 40
PwC’s Mine 2016 looks at the 40 largest listed mining companies by market capitalisation. Four new entrants in this year’s Top 40 were Chinese companies. While AngloGold Ashanti reappeared for the first time since 2013, and the number of emerging companies has increased by two and now totals 19. A lithium company has also made it onto the list.
While this must be viewed in the context of the much larger traditional resources market, there is no doubt that the energy landscape is changing and new world disrupters will have a role to play. The financial information for 2015 covers the reporting periods from 1 April 2014 to 31 December 2015, with each company’s results included for the 12-month financial reporting period that falls into this time frame.
Report insights
- Investors punished the Top 40 for poor investment and capital management decisions, and in some quarters for squandering the benefits of the boom.
- Concerns over the ‘spot mentality’ from shareholders focused on fluctuating commodities prices and short-term returns rather than the long-term investment horizon required in mining.
- A focus on maximising value from shedding assets as well as mothballing marginal projects or curtailing capacity by Top 40 miners. This is further evidenced by a significant drop off in capex, signalling an almost stagnant investment environment.
- A positive focus on cost reduction resulting in a 17% drop in operating costs against a backdrop of higher production volumes and lower input costs – an impressive achievement given the production increases seen during 2015.
Capital discipline and impairment levels
With a further $53bn of impairments in 2015, miners have now collectively wiped out the equivalent of 32% of their actual capex since 2010, a stark reminder of the value that has already been lost. This also represents a hefty 77% of this year’s capital expenditure.
“While it is unfair to focus on the charges incurred this year as price assumptions were adjusted down, a longer-term perspective indicates a lack of capital discipline. In fact, from 2010 to 2015, the Top 40 have impaired the equivalent of a staggering 32% of their capex incurred,” says Andries Rossouw, assurance partner, PwC.
China not the industry hero
While China is still critical to the success of the mining industry, accounting for about 40% of overall commodity demand, it can no longer be relied on to supercharge returns. As the country moves from a manufacturing-based economy to one that is services based, the previously rampant demand for commodities will still not resume with the same intensity. Despite this shift, the number of Chinese mining companies in the Top 40 continued to increase from nine to 12.
Debt burdens will mean some heavy lifting ahead
Debt management has moved to the top of the business agenda for many of the Top 40 miners. For some, the driver was maintaining access to capital at reasonable rates. For others, it was simply crucial to survival. While the Top 40 trimmed a slither of their overall debt in 2015, liquidity metrics have begun to trigger alarms. Leverage is at an all-time high and cash used to repay debt was broadly equal to cash from borrowings. It’s no surprise that the ratings agencies responded with widespread ratings downgrades.
Twofold response
Adds Rossouw: “The response of the Top 40 miners has been twofold: an even greater focus on cutting expenditure, whether operational or expansionary, and an acceleration in asset sales. It will be interesting to see if these efforts can continue and the subsequent knock-on effects.”
While the mining industry continues to face significant challenges and constraints, Rossouw maintains there is still a long-term positive outlook. “Many of the Top 40 appreciate what is required for the marathon of mining and have their eyes firmly fixed on the long-term rewards.”
Related
