But just as our exploitation of fossil fuels led to climate change, the unsustainable use of plastic materials has led to a global environmental catastrophe. To this day, plastic pollution has infiltrated every part of our planet, from remote mountain lakes
to the ocean
to the very air we breathe
The unsustainable consumption of non-renewable resources is the common root of both these problems, and beneath the surface, there are many links between these two issues.
Plastic is part of the carbon cycle
To better understand how plastic particles move through the environment
, scientists should investigate their transport
as they do for nitrogen, carbon and water
To do this, they should formally adopt the terminology used to study these biogeochemical cycles, including “reservoirs”, which are places of storage, and “fluxes”, which describe the movement of substances from one place to another over time. This will help us understand the transport mechanisms and fate of plastic pollution in the environment which are major gaps in the field today.
In a new study published in Nature Communications, my colleagues and I find a stark confirmation that microplastics are found throughout the Arctic Ocean...
Peter S. Ross 1 Feb 2021
In fact, all the plastic that has ever been produced is part of the carbon cycle. Overall, an enormous seven gigatonnes
— or seven billion tonnes — of plastic have been produced, mainly from chemicals extracted from the fossil carbon reservoir
. This is not much different from the roughly 14 billion tonnes of carbon
emitted into the atmosphere every year from the same reservoir due to human activities.
Plastic transports carbon in different ways. For instance, plastic can become incorporated into living organisms
, or settle to the bottom of the ocean as aggregates of plastic and organic matter. It can also release greenhouse gases
at every stage of its life cycle, from production to transportation to waste disposal. Scientists and governments should investigate how plastic pollution transports carbon because nutrient redistribution has implications for the livelihoods of ecosystems and the well-being of living organisms.
As You Sow has filed shareholder proposals with 10 leading consumer goods companies and retailers, calling for commitments to absolute cuts in the use of plastic packaging...
15 Jan 2021
Since plastic polymers are so persistent, almost every piece of plastic we have ever produced is still somewhere on this planet. This suggests, due to the sheer amount of plastic pollution, that plastic pollution is on the same scale as global transport processes of carbon, also on the order of gigatonnes.
The key takeaway is that plastic pollution has its own cycle
, and that it may also play a fundamental role in the carbon cycle — the movement of carbon between different reservoirs such as the atmosphere, ocean and organisms — a cycle that is very relevant to global climate change.
Two sides of the same coin
Several recent articles by journalists
have framed the plastic pollution problem as a distraction from the problem of climate change
. The issue of plastic pollution may compete with climate change for funding and attention, delaying action on what is a more pressing environmental issue, they say.
I disagree. Research shows that the plastic problem is not independent
from climate change.
Waste management can no longer be looked at with a linear view as we move towards 2021. We are seeing national as well as global leaders around the world creating massive awareness around the 'throw-away culture'...
Kate Stubbs 7 Jan 2021
Plastic and climate are two sides of the same coin: the majority of plastic polymers
are made from petrochemical feed-stocks and their raw materials for synthesis are ethylene and propylene. These compounds are derived from naphtha, one of several chemicals refined from petroleum
. What else is refined from petroleum? Gasoline
, the fossil fuel we burn for energy that emits greenhouse gases.
These sister compounds are used differently but they have a common origin and they instigate the very issues in question. When demand for petroleum drops, companies ramp up
their plastic production. When demand for plastic drops, fossil fuel companies might be inclined to shift their production ratio again. Failing to recognise the intimate connections between these issues not only makes tackling these issues inefficient, but may also undermine efforts on both fronts.
In my career as a marine biologist, I've been fortunate enough to visit some of the most remote islands in the world. These beautiful places continue to remind me why I have this job in the first place...
Henrik Österblom 7 Dec 2020
Through the many years of efforts by researchers, activists, and policy-makers around the world, we are starting to see a big difference in public attitude towards these issues. On the climate front, the adoption of the Paris Agreement
and the energy of the youth movement
fill me with optimism.
On the plastic pollution front, a UN international agreement
to limit emissions of plastic may be on the horizon.
By acknowledging the connections between these issues, I only see benefits. Climate plans should acknowledge the greenhouse gas emissions from plastics and how plastics can be better managed. For instance, Canada’s most recent climate plan
acknowledged its ban on single-use items in 2021 and recognised the importance of transitioning to a circular economy
. Likewise, plastic pollution plans can describe the benefits to that city, state or country’s climate strategy by mitigating plastic production.
Moving forward, we should keep this in mind and tackle these two issues together — the opportunities to do so are plentiful.
This article is republished from The Conversation
under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article