
Subscribe & Follow
After termination, are staff preferential interest rates up for debate?

The presumption that is then made is that upon termination of an employment contract, the employer would then convert the interest rate applicable to the facility from a preferential staff rate to a commercial lending rate. This understanding is often expressly reflected in the lending agreement, which stipulates that upon exit, commercial lending rates would apply. However, current jurisprudence suggests that it is no longer that simple.
The prevailing view emanating from various court decisions is that where an employee is unfairly terminated, the preferential mortgage facility cannot be separated from their employment contract. The courts have said that the two are related because the only basis upon which the benefit was extended to the employee was the employment relationship.
This view has been expressed in a recent decision of Kenya's Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) in Zamzam v Gulf African Bank Limited.
In this case, the claimant had obtained a mortgage facility from the respondent bank on preferential staff interest rates, and a mortgage agreement was signed. Subsequently, the claimant’s employment was terminated during the term of the mortgage.
The claimant sued the bank for unfair termination and sought, among other reliefs, that his mortgage facility should continue to attract the preferential staff interest rate.
In agreeing with the claimant, the Court held that
the loan facility cannot be removed from the employment relationship and termination thereof.
Furthermore, the Court held that unfair termination of employment "went to the root of (his) mortgage facility" therefore, an employee should not be disadvantaged by the employer’s breach of fair labour practices.
Key takeaways
This recent decision reiterates the following key principles that employers should keep in mind when extending preferential interest rates for loans offered to their employees:
- Loan and mortgage facilities provided under staff schemes should have very clear and express terms as to the applicability of commercial lending rates, upon termination of employment. Employees’ consent to this should be indicated in writing including a declaration that the terms have been read and understood.
- The general view emanating from the courts is that where an employer is found to have terminated an employee unfairly and the employee had a loan facility with preferential rates, the employer must continue to apply the preferential rates for the remainder of the term of the loan.
- Employers should consider having discounted loan facilities provided by third-party lenders to derisk against them being required to apply the benefit to an exited employee.
Related
Nedlac report on labour law amendments - a look at the proposed changes Chloë Loubser 25 Feb 2025 How VAT registration delays are costing the economy and what Sars should do about it Yasmeen Suliman 13 Feb 2025 Who gets a say? SCA's final word on creditor voting rights in business rescue Juliette De Hutton, Tobie Jordaan, Jessica Osmond and Aanisah Ramroop 7 Feb 2025 Dismissal codes expanded: What employers need to know Keshni Naicker and Amandla Makhongwana 30 Jan 2025 #BizTrends2025: Expect more corporate corruption crackdowns in 2025 Jane Andropoulos 27 Jan 2025 #BizTrends2025: African employment law trends - employee rights and well-being, workplace and technology evolution Chloë Loubser 13 Jan 2025 A&O Shearman SA's legal team finds new home at Bowmans 7 Jan 2025 What you need to know about the new direct marketing guidance note Nadine Mather and Chloë Loubser 11 Dec 2024
About Terry Mwango, Quinter Okuta, Charles Omondi Oyeng and Kelsey Naluende
Terry Mwango, Partner, Quinter Okuta, Senior Associate, Charles Omondi Oyeng, Associate, and Kelsey Naluende, Candidate Legal Practitioner, Bowmans Kenya