Agricultural safeguard levy on poultry could impact SA consumers negatively

©Andor Bujdoso via 123RF

"Considering the current economic climate in South Africa, this could not come at a worse time," says Paul Matthew, CEO Designate from AMIE. He adds: "SA, via the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), in its misguided attempts to protect its domestic poultry industry, has once again imposed a tariff on imports which will, as history has shown, be passed on to those that can least afford it: 'the local consumer'."

Matthew suggests that it contradicts article 34.2 of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between South Africa and the EU which clearly states that trade actions imposed in terms of this agreement must have risen during the tenure of the agreement. This is clearly not the case, as the alleged hardships caused to SA poultry pre-date the implementation of the EPA agreement. South Africa has thus violated these terms and is in serious breach of an international agreement.

Figures published by players in the local poultry sector reflect a highly profitable industry, generating huge shareholder returns and hardly in need of protection, says the AMIE.

Agricultural safeguard levy will boost the local industry, says FairPlay

9 Nov 2018

South Africa could also be liable, according to the association, in that it has not adhered to the tariff implementation terms of the EPA, which states that before any implementation of such a safeguard, the proposed trade measures must be referred to a joint EU/SACU Trade and Development Council for discussion. This step in the process was totally ignored and omitted according to Matthew’s knowledge.

AMIE is currently studying the details of the safeguard and reviewing its options.