
Dealing with defects

The CPA will not have an effect on the voetstoots clause used in agreements of sale in an ordinary property transaction. This is why it is so important for buyers to have property thoroughly inspected before they submit their offer to purchase. There are instances where the buyer is protected if severe defects are found after the transfer has taken place. However, it is difficult to determine whether the seller deliberately concealed the defect or genuinely wasn’t aware of it.
Patent vs. latent defects
There are two kinds of defects. A patent defect is clearly visible on inspection of the property, such as broken window or cracks in the wall. All patent defects should be listed in the offer to purchase, along with who is responsible for fixing them. Because patent defects are visible or obvious without professional inspection, the buyer has no recourse against these types of defects. It is up to the buyer to spot patent defects and then decide whether they would still like to proceed with purchasing the property.
The other type of defect is a latent defect, which is not easily picked up by a superficial inspection. Examples of latent defects include a leaking roof or faulty geyser. Common law states that the seller is responsible for all latent defects in the property for three years from the date of discovery of the defect. Most sellers are aware that they are responsible for latent defects which is why they include the voetstoots clause in the sale agreement. The clause protects the seller against all defects – including latent defects that are unknown to him. However, if the seller was aware of a latent defect and deliberately concealed it from the buyer, the buyer has recourse against the seller. It is important to bear in mind that the onus will be on the buyer to prove that the seller was aware of the defect but deliberately hid it.
Claiming a portion of the purchase price
It will be dependent on the circumstances, but if a latent defect is found, the buyer will be able to cancel the contract or claim a portion of the purchase price. The law prescribes that the buyer will not be allowed to simply obtain a quote for the repair and then deduct it from the purchase price, paying a lesser amount. The buyer can also not refuse to pay occupational rent or a portion therefore unless the defect seriously impairs the use and occupation of the property.
Any defects that are dicovered after the sale of the property but before the property is transferred into the buyer’s name will be for the seller’s account, unless those defects are caused by the buyer during their occupation of the property.
For buyers to ensure that they are fulled protected against any latent defects, they should enlist the services of a professional home inspection company to check the home thoroughly. The price of paying a professional to do the job properly will be far less than the time and hassle caused by dealing with hidden defects.

About Adrian Goslett
Adrian Goslett is CEO and regional director of RE/MAX Southern Africa. He joined RE/MAX Southern Africa in 2005 as a franchise development consultant, supporting various regions and offices. Throughout his career at RE/MAX he has held various positions. In 2010, after successfully leading 160 offices and over 1500 agents in six countries through the worst years real estate has ever seen in South Africa in 30 years, Goslett was appointed as CEO of RE/MAX Southern Africa.Related
Fast food chain slapped with R1m fine for contravening CPA 20 Dec 2024 The Consumer Protection Act and how it applies to lease agreements 1 Aug 2024 What are the insurance implications of product recalls? 15 Feb 2024 How to navigate power imbalances in contract negotiations 31 Jan 2024 Vodacom to pay R1m fine after negating consumers' right to cancel fixed-term contracts 19 Oct 2023 Unpacking the importance of plain language in property agreements 13 Jul 2023
